REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

Monthly Archives: February 2013

Idaho Bankruptcy Court Rules Banks/MERS Lacked Authority to Transfer Notes

February 18, 2013

by Rafe Serouya

In In re WIlhem, 407 B.R. 392 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2009), the Idaho Bankruptcy Court, ruling in 5 similar cases, held that movant banks lacked standing to seek stay relief, and therefore, denied their motions. Movants did not demonstrate possession of the … Continue reading

Read More

North Carolina Appellate Court Finds for Home Owners, Concluding Bank Did Not Produce Sufficient Evidence of Assignment

February 17, 2013

by Joseph Kelly

In In re Adams, 204 N.C. App. 318, 693 S.E.2d 705 (2010) the Court of Appeals of North Carolina overturned the Superior Court and held that the alleged holder (Nationwide), while not required to present the original note and deed, … Continue reading

Read More

District Court of North Dakota Finds MERS has Standing to Foreclose, Rejects All Twelve of Plaintiff’s Challenges

by Joseph Kelly

In Bray v. Bank of Am., 1:09-CV-075, 2011 WL 30307 (D.N.D. Jan. 5, 2011) appeal dismissed, 435 F. App’x 571 (8th Cir. 2011), the court denied plaintiff’s ten motions, including his motion for summary judgment, and granted defendants’, Bank of … Continue reading

Read More

California’s S&P Suit

February 15, 2013

by David Reiss

The California complaint follow on the heels of the DoJ complaint but it hangs its hat on an aggressive theory — that S&P’s ratings violate California’s False Claims Act.  While I do not yet have an opinion about whether that … Continue reading

Read More

The Michigan District Court holds that Aurora Bank has Standing to Foreclose on Homeowners’ Property

by Robert Huberman

In Horton v. Aurora Bank FSB, 1:12-CV-365, 2012 WL 3307451 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012), the Michigan District Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Aaron and Suzanne Hortons’ claims. In January 2007, the Hortons purchased property and executed a promissory note, … Continue reading

Read More

Misleading CoreLogic Report on Qualified Mortgage Rules

February 14, 2013

by David Reiss

The Wall Street Journal reported (behind its paywall) uncritically on a recently released CoreLogic report about the supposed impact of the new Qualified Mortgage rules issued last month by the CFPB on the mortgage market.  The report is very flawed. … Continue reading

Read More

Rhode Island Superior Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Challenge of the Validity of MERS’s Assignment

by Karl Dowden

In Cafua v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, et al., C.A. No. PC 2009-7407, (R.I. Super. June 20, 2012), the plaintiff alleged defaults in the foreclosure process prevented the foreclosing party (HSBC) from having the statutory power of sale. Specifically, the … Continue reading

Read More