REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

January 21, 2015

Supreme Take on Truth in Lending

By David Reiss

The United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. 13-684 (Jan. 13, 2015).  Jesinoski resolved a circuit split regarding notice requirements under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) that apply when a homeowner … Continue reading

Read More

January 21, 2015 in Minnesota | Permalink | No Comments

May 1, 2014

Court Dismissed Minn. Stat. § 559.01 Claims

By Ebube Okoli

The court in deciding Lubbers v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. (D. Minn., 2013) dismissed plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiffs sought to invalidate the foreclosure of the mortgage on their home. Plaintiffs asserted three claims against defendant: (1) quiet-title, … Continue reading

April 29, 2014

Reiss on Supreme Court Mortgage Case

By David Reiss

Law360 quoted me in Supreme Court Takes Up Mortgage Rescission Timing Case (behind a paywall). It reads in part, The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to weigh in on whether federal law requires borrowers to notify creditors in writing of their intention … Continue reading

Read More

April 29, 2014 in Minnesota | Permalink | No Comments

April 16, 2014

Minnesota Court Rejects Tweaked Version of Show-Me-the-Note Claim

By Ebube Okoli

The court in deciding Mutua v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 2013 Minn. Dist. 65 (Minn. Dist. Ct. 2013) found that since the defendant had a valid legal title to plaintiffs’ mortgage. Plaintiffs had failed to state a claim against … Continue reading

Read More

April 16, 2014 in Minnesota | Permalink | No Comments

July 16, 2013

Minnesota Court Holds MERS Foreclosure Valid, Although Signatories on the Assignment Were Officers of More Than One Entity

By Ebube Okoli

The court in deciding Ostigaard v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al., No. 0:10cv1557, (May 2, 2011) granted MERS as well as its codefendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. The court heavily relied on the holding from … Continue reading

Minnesota District Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Fraud Claims and Holds That MERS Had Legal Title and Authority to Foreclose

By Ebube Okoli

The Minnesota District Court in Allen v. Wilford & Geske et al.,No. 70-CV-10-29502 (D. Minn. May 9, 2011), after hearing the plaintiff’s contentions, dismissed his complaint for foreclosure fraud. The court held that MERS had legal title and authority to … Continue reading

July 10, 2013

Minnesota U.S. District Court Finds Homeowners’ Complaint Fails Procedurally and Sanctions Counsel for Frivolous Claims

By Shannon Daugherty

In Blaylock v. Wells Fargo Bank No. 12-693, 2012 WL 2529197, (D. Minn 2012) the court found six individual property mortgage assignments and foreclosures proper, dismissing the quiet title actions on both procedural and substantive grounds.   The court also sanctioned … Continue reading