April 4, 2014
Washington Court Dismisses Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Washington Deed of Trust Act Violation Claims
The court in deciding Dietz v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp., 2014 U.S. Dist. (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2014) granted Wells Fargo and MERS’ motion to dismiss. This action involved is a post-sale wrongful foreclosure case. Plaintiff Timothy Dietz alleged causes … Continue reading
April 4, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
April 3, 2014
Ohio Court of Appeals Finds that BAC had Failed to Demonstrate that it had Standing to Accelerate the Note and Foreclose the Mortgage
The court in deciding BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Blythe, 2013-Ohio-5775 (Ohio Ct. App., Columbiana County, 2013) reversed the lower court’s judgment. Appellant Walter J. Blythe appealed the lower court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee, BAC … Continue reading
April 3, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
April 1, 2014
Tennessee Court Dismisses TILA, RICO, and RESPA Claims
The Tennessee court in deciding Mhoon v. United States Bank Home Mortg., 2013 U.S. Dist. (W.D. Tenn., 2013) dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff [Mhoon] filed a complaint against defendant U.S. Bank. This … Continue reading
April 1, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
March 28, 2014
Ohio Court Held That the Promissory Note was a Negotiable Instrument Subject to Relevant Provisions of R.C. Chapter 1303
The court in deciding Bank of Am., N.A. v. Pasqualone, 2013-Ohio-5795 (Ohio Ct. App., Franklin County, 2013) ultimately decided that the motion to strike moot, thus this court affirmed judgment of the lower court. This court held that the promissory … Continue reading
March 28, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
March 26, 2014
Ohio Court Decides Bank’s Possession of Note was Properly Shown
The court in deciding M & T Bank v. Strawn, 2013-Ohio-5845 (Ohio Ct. App., Trumbull County, 2013) ultimately affirmed the lower court’s decision. The court decided that the bank’s possession of the note was shown by the affidavit, along with … Continue reading
March 26, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Ohio Court Decided There Was no Basis to Challenge Standing Through a Civ.R. 60(B) Motion
The court in deciding Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Santisi, 2013-Ohio-5848 (Ohio Ct. App., Trumbull County, 2013) ultimately denied the motion to vacate and affirmed the lower court’s decision. Santisi appealed the lower court’s decision and raised the following … Continue reading
March 26, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
March 11, 2014
This Note and Mortgage Are Unenforceable
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit issued a thoughtful opinion in In re: Dorsey, File No. 14b0002n.06 (March 7, 2014) but it leaves me dissatisfied. As Elizabeth Renuart and Dale Whitman have each demonstrated, courts have had a … Continue reading
March 11, 2014 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments