REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Cornell Law School

Monthly Archives: January 2013

Texas Case Distinguishes Between a Holder and an Owner of Promissory Notes

January 10, 2013

by Karl Dowden

In Martin v. New Century Mortgage Company, et al., 2012 Tex. App. Lexis 4705 (Houston 1st Court of Appeals, June 14, 2012), the plaintiffs executed a deed of trust and promissory note with New Century Mortgage Corporation. The deed of … Continue reading

Read More

CFPB Releases Ability-To-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Final Rules

by David Reiss

The CFPB has released the final rules relating to ability-to-repay and Qualified Mortgages.  The CFPB’s Summary is currently available. The big news is that qualified mortgages do NOT have a minimum down payment requirement.  This was a very big bone … Continue reading

Read More

Waiver and Equitable Estoppel Argument Rejected by Texas Court

by Karl Dowden

The federal Court of Appeals in Texas affirmed a district court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims in Wigginton v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al., No. 12-10136, (5th Cir. 2012). Two weeks after two default notices were sent to … Continue reading

Read More

General Challenge to MERS Rejected by Texas Federal District Court

by Karl Dowden

The United States Southern District Court of Texas defended MERS in Richard v. CIT Group, et al., No. H-12-848 (S.D. Tex Jul. 21, 2012). The plaintiff’s attorney challenged the standing of the defendants and the use of MERS. The plaintiff … Continue reading

Read More

S&P Is Optimistic That Residential Mortgage Market Is Rising From Bottom

by David Reiss

S&P’s Outlook Assumptions for the U.S. Residential Mortgage Market support our view of loss projections on an archetypical mortgage loan pool (see description in section IV). The base-case loss projection of 0.5% for U.S. prime mortgage loan pools, incorporates our … Continue reading

Read More

New York Supreme Court Holds that Assignee Banks Must Produce Evidence of MERS’s Authority to Assign in Order to Have Standing to Foreclose

January 9, 2013

by Michael Liptrot

The New York Supreme Court of Kings County in Bank of New York v. Alderazi, 28 Misc. 3d 376 (Sup. Ct. 2010) held that a foreclosing bank, as assignee, does not have standing to bring a foreclosure action if it … Continue reading

Read More

Scheindlin Allows More Fraud Claims Against Rating Agencies To Go To Trial

by David Reiss

Judge Scheindlin (SDNY) has ruled that investors can proceed with their fraud claims against the big three rating agencies for giving a top rating to a SIV.  There are no surprises in this opinion as it tracks the reasoning of … Continue reading

Read More