REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

March 15, 2013

United States Court of Appeals Holds that MERS has Standing to Foreclose on Homeowner’s Property because the Promissory Note, Mortgage, and Assignment were Valid and Homeowner Defaulted on His Loan

By Robert Huberman

In Yuille v. Am. Home Mortg. Services, Inc., 483 F. App’x 132 (6th Cir. 2012), the United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit held that homeowner’s quiet title claim failed because the note, mortgage, and assignment were valid and the … Continue reading

Read More

March 15, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments

March 14, 2013

Michigan District Court Dismisses Mortgagor’s Claims to Void a Foreclosure Sale Because the Redemption Period Had Expired

By Abigail Pugliese

In Duff v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass’n, No. 2:11-cv-12474, 2012 WL 692120 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 29, 2012), the District Court dismissed Mortgagor Plaintiff’s claims to void the foreclosure sale because Plaintiff failed to state a claim and the period of … Continue reading

Read More

March 14, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments

By Karl Dowden

In Cooke v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., et al., CA No. PC 2011-3487 (R.I. Sup. August 29, 2012), the plaintiff alleged that the assignment of the mortgage interest from MERS to the Federal National Mortgage Association, FNMA, was invalid. … Continue reading

Read More

March 14, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments

March 11, 2013

Michigan Court Holds that Foreclosure Sale May Be Voidable When Assignee Does Not Record the Mortgage Before Foreclosure

By Abigail Pugliese

In Kim v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 825 N.W2d 329 (Mich. 2012), the court held that a foreclosure sale was voidable since the assignment of the mortgage to Defendant Bank was not recorded. Mortgagor Plaintiffs executed a mortgage agreement with … Continue reading

Read More

March 11, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments

March 8, 2013

The Georgia Northern District Court Holds that Homeowner does not have Standing to Stop Non-Judicial Foreclosure because Homeowner’s claim that MERS Fraudulently Assigned Homeowner’s Deed is not Casually Connected to the Foreclosure on her Property

By Robert Huberman

In Dehdashti v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al., 1:12-cv-595-TCB, (N.D.Ga. June 7, 2012), the Georgia Northern District Court dismissed homeowner’s claims because she did not have standing. have more money now Manizeh Dehdashti alleged that Bank of New … Continue reading

Read More

March 8, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments

March 5, 2013

Michigan Court of Appeals holds that Bank has Standing to Foreclose on Property by Advertisement because Bank had a Sufficient Interest in the Indebtedness Secured by the Mortgage as Record Holder of the Mortgage

By Robert Huberman

In Fawaz v. Aurora Loan Services LLC, 302840, 2012 WL 1521589 (Mich. Ct. App. May 1, 2012), the Michigan Court of Appeals held that Aurora Loan Servicing LLC had standing to foreclose on homeowners’ property by advertisement. Nazih and Iman … Continue reading

Read More

March 5, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments

March 2, 2013

Kansas Court of Appeals Holds that Severance of Mortgage and Note Cured by Subsequent Assignment of Mortgage from MERS to Bank

By Gloria Liu

In U.S. Bank v. Howie, 280 P.3d 225 (Kan. App., 2012), the court held that U.S. Bank had standing to foreclose because there was an agency relationship between MERS and U.S. Bank. It also upheld that severance can be cured … Continue reading

Read More

March 2, 2013 in 2012 | Permalink | No Comments