REFinBlog

March 14, 2013

Michigan District Court Dismisses Mortgagor’s Claims to Void a Foreclosure Sale Because the Redemption Period Had Expired

In Duff v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass’n, No. 2:11-cv-12474, 2012 WL 692120 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 29, 2012), the District Court dismissed Mortgagor Plaintiff’s claims to void the foreclosure sale because Plaintiff failed to state a claim and the period of … Continue reading →

Michigan Court of Appeals Holds that Foreclosure is Void Because Mortgagee Commenced the Foreclosure Before It Obtained an Interest in the Indebtedness

In Davenport v. HSBC Bank USA, 739 N.W.2d 383 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007), the Court of Appeals held that the foreclosure was void ab initio because Assignee Defendant did not have an interest in the indebtedness secured by the mortgage … Continue reading →

Michigan District Court Grants MERS’s Motion for Summary Judgment because, as Mortgagee, MERS had Standing To Foreclose

In Corgan v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 1:09-cv-939, 2010 WL 2854421 (W.D. Mich. July 20, 2010), the District Court granted MERS’s motion for summary judgment because MERS had the right to foreclosure as “Mortgagee” pursuant to the mortgage … Continue reading →

Michigan Appellate Court Holds that Party with Ownership of an Interest in the Note May Only Foreclose by Judicial Process

In Bakri v. MERS, No. 297962, 2011 WL 3476818 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 9, 2011), the Court of Appeals held that Defendants may only foreclose by judicial process since they only had an ownership interest in the note, and not … Continue reading →

In Cooke v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., et al., CA No. PC 2011-3487 (R.I. Sup. August 29, 2012), the plaintiff alleged that the assignment of the mortgage interest from MERS to the Federal National Mortgage Association, FNMA, was invalid. … Continue reading →

March 13, 2013

Texas Court of Appeals Holds that Foreclosure Proceedings Do Not Require Production of the Original Note

In Hornbuckle v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,  No. 02-09-00330-CV (TX Ct. App. 2, May. 19, 2011), the court affirmed a lower court decision allowing judicial foreclosure. The homeowners purchased home by obtaining an FHA loan from Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc. … Continue reading →

Arizona Bankruptcy Court Imposes Duty on Attorney to Act with Reasonable Diligence

In In re: Madison, No. 2:09-bk-22225-SSC (Bankr. D. Ariz., March 30, 2011), the court held that an attorney has the duty to act with reasonable diligence in representing his client and communicating adequately with both the client and the court. The … Continue reading →