REFinBlog

January 31, 2014

Michigan Court Finds Plaintiff’s Argument to Prevent Removal Lacked Merit

The court in Ordway v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145228 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 8, 2013) granted defendants’ motion and denied plaintiff’s motion. This was a case challenging foreclosure proceedings. Plaintiff named Bank of America, N.A. … Continue reading →

January 19, 2014

Michigan Court Grants Summary Judgement in Favor of Bank

The court in deciding Wargelin v. Bank of Am., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146326 ( E.D. Mich. 2013) ultimately granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff brought an action arising out of a foreclosure and subsequent sheriff’s sale of his … Continue reading →

December 24, 2013

Michigan Court Holds That Plaintiffs Were Not Subject to Double Liabilty on Their Debt and Thus Lacked Standing

The court in deciding Laues v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147912 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2013) granted the defendant’s motion and dismissed the plaintiff’s claim. Plaintiffs Roy A. Laues and Kristin G. Laues (“the Laues”), … Continue reading →

Michigan Court Dismisses State Claims Against 13 Defendants – Including Wells Fargo

The court in deciding Berry v. Main St. Bank, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147915 ( E.D. Mich. 2013) granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and the plaintiff’s claims were dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff Erik Berry initiated this action against thirteen … Continue reading →

Michigan Court Dismisses MCPA & HOEPA Claims

The court in deciding Huff v. Fannie Mae, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148053 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 2013) granted Bank of America’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff advanced a claim against defendants for quiet title (Count I) and alleged that defendants violated … Continue reading →

December 23, 2013

Michigan Court Dismisses Fraud & RESPA Claims

The court in deciding Neroni v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149190 ( E.D. Mich. 2013) eventually granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs alleged claims against defendant [Bank of America, N.A.] for infringement of the Real … Continue reading →

December 13, 2013

Court Dismisses Plaintiffs’ RESPA Claims Because Defendant Was Not Under Legal Obligation to Respond to Plaintiffs

The court in deciding Neroni v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149190 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 17, 2013) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs alleged several claims in their complaint against … Continue reading →