REFinBlog

February 21, 2013

Rhode Island Superior Court Addresses Issues Payette Did Not

In Kriegel v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, PC2010-7099 (R.I. Sup. October 13, 2011), the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim. The plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment and petition to quiet title for his property. The plaintiff … Continue reading →

Ohio Appellate Court Holds that Bank Has Standing even though Assignment Was Not Recorded Before Bank Initiated Foreclosure Action

In Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Ingle, No. 92487, 2009 WL 2400852 (Ohio Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2009), the Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company … Continue reading →

Ohio Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Favor of Bank Despite Bank Commencing Foreclosure Action Before Executing Mortgage Assignment

In Bank of New York v. Stuart, No. 06CA008953, 2007 WL 936706 (Ohio Ct. App. March 30, 2007), the appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the Bank of New York (the “Bank”) despite the fact that the Bank … Continue reading →

Ohio Court Holds that a Bank Cannot Cure Lack of Standing by a Subsequent Mortgage Assignment

In Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Assoc. et al. v. Byrd, 897 N.E.2d 722 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008), the Court of Appeals ruled that Wells Fargo (the “Bank”) lacked standing because it commenced a foreclosure action before executing a mortgage assignment. … Continue reading →

Ohio Appellate Court Holds that Bank Lacks Standing Because It Commenced a Foreclosure Action Before Mortgage Was Assigned to Bank

In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jordan, No. 91675, 2009 WL 625560 (Ohio Ct. App. March 12, 2009), the Ohio Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment, because Wells Fargo (the “Bank”) was not … Continue reading →

February 19, 2013

1st Circuit Holds that MA Borrowers Can Challenge Mortgage Assignments

A First Circuit panel (including Justice Souter) ruled that under Massachusetts law, “a mortgagor has standing to challenge a mortgage assignment as invalid, ineffective, or void (if, say, the assignor had nothing to assign or had no authority to make … Continue reading →

Eastern District of North Carolina Requires Homeowners to Allege Ability to Fully Tender Outstanding Balance of Loan to State a Claim for Rescission Under TILA, Dismisses All Other Claims

In Ward v. Sec. Atl. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 858 F. Supp. 2d 561 (E.D.N.C. 2012), appeal dismissed (May 30, 2012) the Eastern District of North Carolina granted defendants’ motion to dismiss claims brought against them by borrowers for … Continue reading →