REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Cornell Law School

Texas Case Distinguishes Between a Holder and an Owner of Promissory Notes

By Karl Dowden

In Martin v. New Century Mortgage Company, et al., 2012 Tex. App. Lexis 4705 (Houston 1st Court of Appeals, June 14, 2012), the plaintiffs executed a deed of trust and promissory note with New Century Mortgage Corporation. The deed of … Continue reading

General Challenge to MERS Rejected by Texas Federal District Court

By Karl Dowden

The United States Southern District Court of Texas defended MERS in Richard v. CIT Group, et al., No. H-12-848 (S.D. Tex Jul. 21, 2012). The plaintiff’s attorney challenged the standing of the defendants and the use of MERS. The plaintiff … Continue reading

January 5, 2013

Alabama Civil Court of Appeals finds that MERS Assignee has Standing to Initiate Foreclosure Proceedings

By Gloria Liu

In Crum v. LaSalle Bank, 55 So.3d 266, (Ala. Civ. App. 2009), the court held that the assignee of the mortgage, LaSalle Bank had standing to initiate foreclosure proceedings. The court reasoned that MERS and the assignee were not delivered a … Continue reading

December 24, 2012

District Court of Arizona finds homeowners do not have standing to challenge validity of assignments of deed of trust

By Joseph Kelly

In Campbell v. California Reconveyance Co., CV-11-00180-PHX-DGC, 2012 WL 5299099 (D. Ariz. Oct. 25, 2012), the court denied plaintiffs/homeowners, David & Marie Campbells’ motion for summary judgment, finding they lacked standing. In July, 2006, plaintiffs received a loan from First … Continue reading

December 20, 2012

9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Homeowner’s Challenges to Non-judicial Foreclosure in Arizona

By Joseph Kelly

In Buchna v. Bank of Am., NA, 478 F. App’x 425 (9th Cir. 2012), the court affirmed the District Court of Arizona’s dismissal of plaintiffs/homeowners Mariusz and Julita Buchna’s action against Bank of America, MERS, and Bank of New York Melon … Continue reading