REFinBlog

July 10, 2014

Connecticut Court Denies All Five of Defendant’s Special Defenses to Foreclosure Action

The court in deciding Bank of Am., N.A. v. Samaha, 2013 Conn. Super. (Conn. Super. Ct., 2013) granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. In this action, the plaintiff sought to foreclose a mortgage executed by Joseph Samaha and Denise … Continue reading →

June 27, 2014

Tennessee Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s TCPA Claim

The court in deciding Amour v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. (E.D. Tenn., 2013) granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s motion to dismiss The plaintiffs brought three separate causes of action each of which the … Continue reading →

Court Decides that Lower Court Was Correct in Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of Bank of America and ReconTrust on FDCPA Claims

The court in deciding Brown v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Brown), 2013 Bankr. (B.A.P. 9th Cir., 2013) affirmed the lower court’s holding. The plaintiff in this case alleged alleged that BAC and ReconTrust violated the CPA by promulgating, … Continue reading →

Texas Court Rejects Claims Brought on the Grounds of “Show-me-the-Note” and “Split-the-Note” Theories

The court in deciding Hunt v. Worldwide Mortg. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. (N.D. Tex., 2013) dismissed the plaintiff’s action in its entirety and specifically granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs asserted claims for fraud (only against MidFirst and its … Continue reading →

June 26, 2014

Alabama Court Rejects “Split-the-Note” Theory

The court in deciding Gray v. MERSCORP, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. (N.D. Ala., 2013) rejected the split the note theory put forward by Gray. This matter arose out of a note and mortgage executed in March 2007 by plaintiffs Clayburn … Continue reading →

Alabama Court Reverses Lower Court’s Decision Granting Summary Judgment to Foreclosing Entity

The court in deciding Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. (Ala. Civ. App., 2013) reversed the lower court’s ruling that granted summary judgment to a foreclosing entity with respect to its complaint in ejectment against … Continue reading →

June 25, 2014

Michigan Court Rejects TILA and RESPA Claims in Granting Summary Judgment

The court in deciding Morton v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. (W.D. Mich., 2013) ultimately concluded that the moving defendants are entitled to judgment on all plaintiff’s claims as a matter of law. Plaintiff asserted that none of … Continue reading →