September 19, 2013
Court Holds MERS’ Previous Business Activities Prior to Proper Registration in California Did Not Render its Foreclosing Illegal
The court in Perlas et al v. MERS, No. C 09-4500 (N.D.Cal. 2010) held that MERS’ previous business activities prior to becoming registered to do business in California did not render its foreclosing activities illegal. Despite the plaintiff’s arguments to … Continue reading
September 19, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
California Court of Appeals Holds That the Right to Challenge a Nominee’s Authority to Foreclose on Behalf of Note Holder Would Fundamentally Undermine the Non-Judicial Nature of the Process
The Fourth District California Court of Appeals in considering Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 192 Cal.App.4th 1149 (2011), affirmed the lower court’s decision upholding MERS’ ability to initiate non-judicial foreclosure actions. The appellant argued that he was entitled to … Continue reading
September 19, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
September 18, 2013
Show Me The Note, NY Style
Steiner, Goldstein & Sohn published a short article in the New York Law Journal, Clearing The Confusion: Misplaced Notes and Allonges (Sept. 18, 2012) (behind a paywall). While intended to address commercial real estate finance, it relies on an interesting … Continue reading
September 18, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
September 17, 2013
United States District Court Rules That MERS Had The Power to Assign the Deed of Trust
The United States District Court of the Eastern District of California in deciding Coburn v. Bank of New York Mellon, N.A., 2:10-CV-03080 (2010) granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court also handed down the ruling that the plaintiff’s claim of … Continue reading
September 17, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Arkansas Court Finds That Based on Security Agreement, MERS Was the Mortgagee
The Arkansas court considering Coley v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. et al, 4 10 CV01870 (E.D. Ark. 2011) ultimately granted the defendants’ motion for dismissal. The court granted the dismissal with prejudice as to the plaintiff’s wrongful foreclosure claims. The … Continue reading
September 17, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
September 13, 2013
United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas Dismisses Borrower’s Claim of Invalid Assignment
The United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas in Kimberly Peace v. MERS, 4:09-cv-00966 (2010) granted MERS’ motion to dismiss. The court found that the assignment to MERS was valid. This also led the court to decide that BAC … Continue reading
September 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Arkansas Court Denies MERS’ Motion to Set a Decree of Foreclosure
The Arkansas court in MERS v. Southwest Homes of Arkansas, 301 S.W.3d 1 (2009) denied MERS’ motion to set a decree of foreclosure, therein affirming the decision from the lower court. As the record beneficiary of the deed of trust, … Continue reading
September 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments