June 6, 2013
REMIC Armageddon on the Horizon?
Brad Borden and I have warned that an unanticipated tax consequence of the sloppy mortgage origination practices that characterized the boom is that MBS pools may fail to qualify as REMICs. This would have massively negative tax consequences for MBS … Continue reading
June 6, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | No Comments
May 10, 2013
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts Finds Bank had Failed to Prove it was Present Title Holder of the Mortgage, Denies Relief from Automatic Stay
In In re Moreno, 08-17715-FJB, 2010 WL 2106208 (Bankr. D. Mass. May 24, 2010), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts found that creditor/Property Asset Management, Inc. (“PAM”) had failed to prove its burden that it had standing to … Continue reading
May 10, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | No Comments
April 22, 2013
Cherry Bombs in Michigan
An ongoing Michigan state case, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cherryland Mall L.P. et al., has been generating a lot of heat over an obscure but important issue for commercial mortgage borrowers, the scope of carveouts from standard nonrecourse provisions … Continue reading
April 22, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | No Comments
April 12, 2013
Massachusetts Bankruptcy Court Denies Motion for Relief from Stay
In In Re Hayes, 393 B.R. 259, 261-62 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2008), the Debtor, Hayes, filed a voluntary Chapter 13 petition involving property encumbered by a mortgage, which secured an adjustable rate note. The note and mortgage identified Argent Mortgage … Continue reading
April 12, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | No Comments
April 11, 2013
Careful When Putting Shoe on Other Foot
Nestor Davidson has posted a very useful article to SSRN, New Formalism in the Aftermath of the Housing Crisis. The article notes that as “borrower advocates have responded to [the] surge in mortgage distress, they have found success raising a … Continue reading
April 11, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | 1 Comment
April 9, 2013
U.S. Bankruptcy Court of Western District Missouri Holds that Agency Relationship created when MERS is Designated as a Nominee
In re Tucker, 441 B.R. 638 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2010), court held that designation of MERS as a nominee in the Mortgage is “more than sufficient to create an agency relationship between MERS and the Lender and its successors in … Continue reading
April 9, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | No Comments
March 28, 2013
Kansas Bankruptcy Court Finds that Agency Relationship Exists With Use of the Word “Nominee”
Martinez v. MERS, et al., No. 09‐40886, 2011 WL 489905 (Bankr. D. Kan. Feb. 10, 2011), the court held that assignment of the Note and Mortgage to different entities does not render them void because such a split may be … Continue reading
March 28, 2013 in Bankruptcy litigation | Permalink | No Comments
