REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

February 5, 2013

Ohio Court of Appeals Holds that MERS, as Mortgagee, has Standing to Foreclose Despite Lacking a Beneficial Interest in the Note

By Michael Liptrot

In Mtge. Electronic Registration Sys., Inc., v. Mosley, 2010-Ohio-2886, the Court of Appeals of Ohio held that MERS had standing to foreclose on the homeowners. The court found that language in the mortgage naming MERS as nominee, as well as … Continue reading

Read More

February 5, 2013 in Ohio | Permalink | No Comments

January 28, 2013

Northern District of Ohio Holds that Mortgage Conveys Beneficial Interest to MERS as Nominee, Mortgagee

By Michael Liptrot

In Meehan v. Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 1:11CV363, 2011 WL 3360193 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 3, 2011), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio held that MERS had a beneficial interest in the property based on … Continue reading

Read More

January 28, 2013 in Ohio | Permalink | No Comments

January 25, 2013

Southern District of Ohio Unable to Determine Lenders’ Standing, Orders Lenders to Submit More Evidence or Have Case Dismissed

By Michael Liptrot

In In re Foreclosure Cases, 521 F. Supp. 2d 650 (S.D. Ohio 2007), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio reviewed 27 private foreclosure actions based on federal diversity jurisdiction. In this case, the court was … Continue reading

Read More

January 25, 2013 in Ohio | Permalink | No Comments

Ohio Appellate Court Holds that Lender, as the Real Party in Interest, has Standing to Foreclose

By Michael Liptrot

delaware florida illinois kentucky In Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Shifflet, 2010-Ohio-1266, the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Third District held that the lender had standing to bring a foreclosure action against the homeowners. The homeowners argued that “MERS, … Continue reading

Read More

January 25, 2013 in Ohio | Permalink | No Comments

Foreclosure = Debt Collection

By David Reiss

The Sixth Circuit ruled in Glazer v. Chase Home Finance LLC, __ F.3d ___ (Case No. 10-3416, Jan. 14, 2013) that “that mortgage foreclosure is debt collection under” the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. (2) As Glazer indicates, courts have … Continue reading

Read More

January 25, 2013 in Ohio | Permalink | No Comments

January 24, 2013

Ohio State Court of Appeals Holds that Bank has Standing to Foreclose

By Michael Liptrot

In Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Traxler, 2010-Ohio-3940, the Court of Appeals, Ninth District of the State of Ohio held that the bank had standing to commence a foreclosure action against the homeowners. The homeowners argued that the bank … Continue reading

Read More

January 24, 2013 in Ohio | Permalink | No Comments