REFinBlog

January 9, 2014

Texas Court Dismisses Action Claiming Fraud in Concealment, Fraud in Inducement, Quiet Title, & Rescission

The court in deciding Diaz-Angarita v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147091 (S.D. Tex. 2013) eventually dismissed the plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for “fraud in the concealment,” fraud in the inducement, to quiet title, … Continue reading →

January 7, 2014

California Court Dismisses Claim Due to lack of Standing and Failure to State a Claim

The court in deciding Britto v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146978 (N.D. Cal. 2013) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. In this foreclosure action, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of standing and failure to … Continue reading →

California Court Dismisses All 12 Claims

The court in deciding Scott v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146988 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2013) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend in part. Plaintiff’s brought 12 claims against defendants. Plaintiff’s first claim for … Continue reading →

California Court Finds That Defendants Complied With Statutory Mandate That the Notice of Default Include Sufficient Contact Information

The court in deciding Wagma Safi v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147005 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2013) ultimately granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. In her first cause of action, the plaintiff asked for declaratory relief in … Continue reading →

December 28, 2013

California Court Dismisses Show-Me-the-Note Claim

The court in deciding Newman v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147562 (E.D. Cal. 2013) granted the defendant’s motion and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff (Newman) argued that he was not challenging the authorization to foreclose, nor was … Continue reading →

December 27, 2013

Utah Court Dismisses HAMP, RICO, ECOA, RESPA & FDCPA Claims

The court in deciding Cornia v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149592 (D. Utah 2013) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs’ claims based on securitization, assignment to MERs, or “robo-signing,” were dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ complaint sought … Continue reading →

Texas Court Found That There Was no Gap in Chain of Title

The court in deciding Acosta v. Fannie Mae, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148066 (S.D. Tex. 2013) found that Under Section 51.0025 of the Texas Property Code, BOA had standing to foreclose as servicer of the loan. Plaintiff asserted numerous claims … Continue reading →