REFinBlog

July 22, 2013

Washington Court Holds That the Language of the Security Instrument Gave MERS Both the Authority to Foreclose and Assign the Deed of Trust

The court Salmon v. Bank of America, MERS et al., No. 10-446 (D. Wash. May 25, 2011) dismissed claims against Bank of America and MERS. The plaintiffs argued that MERS was a “ghost-beneficiary” and as such could not be the … Continue reading →

July 9, 2013

Washington District Court Denies Plaintiff Mortgagors’ Motion for Injunctive Relief Against Foreclosure Sale

In Erickson v. IndyMac Bank, No. C11-598RAJ (W.D. Wash. July 14, 2011), plaintiff mortgagors Gregory Erickson and Aleksandra Makarova filed this action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against defendant mortgagee Indymac Bank for … Continue reading →

April 18, 2013

Washington State Court Holds that Defendants Could Not Challenge Chase’s Authority to Foreclose During an Unlawful Detainer Action

In JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Pace, 163 Wash.App 1017 (2011), the Court of Appeals of Washington affirmed a lower court’s ruling granting Plaintiff summary judgment. In the case at hand, Defendants owned real property in Washington. In February 2005, … Continue reading →

April 12, 2013

United States Western District Court Rejected Claim that MERS is not a Beneficiary

In Cebrun v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. C10-5742-BHS, 2011 WL 321992 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 2, 2011), the court rejected homeowner’s claims “regarding MERS not being a beneficiary under the security instrument.” The Court considered that plaintiffs had signed a … Continue reading →

March 20, 2013

Washington District Court Holds that if MERS has a Beneficial Interest, the Designee can Initiate Foreclosure

In Daddabbo et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, No. C09‐1417‐RAJ, 2010 WL 2102485 (W.D. Wash. May 20, 2010), the court found that MERS had a beneficial interest in the note that the deed of trust secures. The court rejected the … Continue reading →

Washington District Court Held that MERS was Properly a Beneficiary

In  Vawter v. Quality Loan Service Corp. of Washington, 707 F.Supp.2d 1115 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 22, 2010), the court dismissed the homeowner’s claim on the basis that MERS was properly a beneficiary and entitled to effect sale of defaulted‐upon property. … Continue reading →

December 5, 2012

Washington State Supreme Court Holds that MERS is Not a Lawful Beneficiary Under Washington’s Deed of Trust Act and Homeowners May Have a Cause of Action Against MERS Under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act

Sitting en banc, the Washington Supreme Court in Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc., 285 P.3d 34 (Wash. 2012) answered two of three certified questions from the Federal District Court for the Western District of Washington in favor of two … Continue reading →