REFinBlog

June 19, 2013

Rhode Island Superior Court Deems PennyMac Foreclosure Proper

In Rutter v. MERS, et al., C.A. No. PC 10-4756 (R.I. Super. March 12, 2012) the Rhode Island Superior Court held that PennyMac’s foreclosure sale was proper, as the court upheld Rhode Island case law supporting the validity of MERS’s … Continue reading →

June 13, 2013

Shaky South Carolina Opinion Finds That Bank Owned Note in Foreclosure Action

The South Carolina Court of Appeals held in Bank of America v. Draper et al., no. 5140 (June 5, 2013) that Bank of America had standing in a foreclosure action and had proved that it owned the mortgage note.  The … Continue reading →

June 11, 2013

Fieldstone Mortgage Company’s Bankruptcy Won’t Impact HSBC’s Right to Foreclose in Massachusetts

In Marron v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Bankruptcy Appeal No. 11-40191-NMG (D. Mass. September 26, 2012), the District Court denied homeowners’ request for certification regarding MERS’s authority to assign their mortgage, and dismissed homeowners’ bankruptcy appeal holding that the Bankruptcy … Continue reading →

June 7, 2013

Mass. Trial Court Upholds MERS Foreclosure

Judge Cutler granted MERS and Countrywide’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Lyons challenge to the validity of a foreclosure deed arising from a foreclosure sale conducted by MERS in Lyons v. MERS et al. Misc. 09 416377 (Jan. 4, 2011). The … Continue reading →

Rhode Island Superior Court Finds MERS has Standing and Assignment to Deutsche Bank Post-Foreclosure was Unchallengeable by Property Owners

In Deutsche Bank v. Falconer (R.I. Sup. May 1, 2012) three actions were consolidated into one opinion. Deutsche prevailed on its possession of property claim in the Sixth Division District Court and Falconer appealed the decision and also filed a … Continue reading →

Bank of New York Deemed Indispensable Party to Homeowner’s Foreclosure Challenge in Rhode Island

In Rosano v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., et al., C.A. No. PC 2010-0310 (R.I. Super. June 19, 2012), the court held that defendant MERS had authority to assign plaintiff homeowner’s mortgage and deemed the foreclosure sale by assignee Bank … Continue reading →

June 5, 2013

Massachusetts District Court Rejects Homeowner-Plaintiff’s Challenge of the Validity of MERS’s Assignment in a Foreclosure Proceeding

In Kiah v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC, No. 10-40161-FDA, 2011 WL 841282 (D.Mass. Mar.4, 2011), the plaintiff-homeowner alleged that discrepancies in the assignment process prevented the foreclosing party [Aurora Loan Services, LLC] from having statutory power to initiate such proceedings. … Continue reading →