REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

September 13, 2013

Arkansas Court Denies MERS’ Motion to Set a Decree of Foreclosure

By Ebube Okoli

The Arkansas court in MERS v. Southwest Homes of Arkansas, 301 S.W.3d 1 (2009) denied MERS’ motion to set a decree of foreclosure, therein affirming the decision from the lower court. As the record beneficiary of the deed of trust, … Continue reading

September 12, 2013

Just Shoot Me

By David Reiss

Florida Twelfth Judicial Circuit Magistrate Bailey issued a Recommended Order in HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al. v. Marra, No. 2008 CA 000630 NC (Aug. 14, 2013) that makes you want to give up.  Not because of the judge, … Continue reading

August 22, 2013

Oregon Court Stops Foreclosure Pending Clarification in State Court as to MERS Stating Borrower Has “Likelihood of Success Against MERS…”

By Ebube Okoli

The court in Rinegard-Guirma v. Bank of America, et al., Civil Case No. 10-1065-PK, (2010) enjoined the defendants [Bank of America, et al.] from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s [Rinegard-Guirma] property. The plaintiff, Natache D. Rinegard-Guirma, filed a Motion for a … Continue reading

August 2, 2013

Borden and Reiss on Show Me The Note!

By David Reiss

Brad and I were e-interviewed by the Knowledge Effect, a Thomson Reuters blog on our recent article (co-authored with KeAupuni Akina), Show Me The Note!.  The interview is below: Westlaw Journals: Your commentary is about the success of the “show … Continue reading

August 1, 2013

A REMIC Unraveling?

By David Reiss

An unpublished opinion, Glaski v. Bank of America, No. F064556 (7/31/13, Cal. 5th App. Dist.), presents one possible future for REMICs that failed to comply with the strict rules set for them by Congress and the IRS. Glaski, a homeowner, … Continue reading

Nevada Supreme Court Holds a Bank’s Mere Possession of the Note and Deed of Trust is not Sufficient to Create an “Enforceable Interest”

By Shannon Daugherty

In Leyva v. Nat’l Default Servicing Corp., 255 P.3d 1275 (Nev. 2011) the court found in favor of Leyva that mere possession of the mortgage note does not create an “enforceable interest in the property subject of the mediation.”  The … Continue reading

Nevada Supreme Court Holds Sanctions are Proper in Foreclosure Mediation when Bank Fails to Provide Either Documents Required by Statute or an Adequate Representative

By Shannon Daugherty

In Pasillas v. HSBC Bank USA, 255 P.3d 1281 (Nev. 2011), the court held sanctions are appropriate  when a bank 1) fails to provide documents required by statute at a mediation session or 2) fails to send a representative with … Continue reading