March 27, 2013
Georgia Bankruptcy Court Holds that Security Deed Creates an Agency Relationship Between Lender and MERS
In Drake v. Citizens Bank of Effingham, et. al., AP No. 10-4033 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Feb. 28, 2011), the court held that the security deed granted to MERS satisfied the requirements of Georgia law and the language of the security … Continue reading
March 27, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
March 26, 2013
District Court of Arizona Rejects Homeowners’ Motion to Remand, Grants Lender’s Motion to Dismiss, Without Prejudice
In Kane v. Bosco, 10-CV-01787-PHX-JAT, 2010 WL 4879177 (D. Ariz. Nov. 23, 2010) the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to remand, and granted defendants’ motions to dismiss, without prejudice. In 2005 plaintiffs/homeowners, Peter and Diane Kane, refinanced their residential loan for … Continue reading
March 26, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | 1 Comment
March 19, 2013
Florida Appellate Court Reverses Summary Judgment in Favor of Bank in Foreclosure Action Because of Issues of Fact as to Whether Bank Had Standing to Foreclose
In BAC Funding Consortium Inc. ISAOA/ATIMA v. Jean-Jacques, 28 So.3d 936 (2010), the Second District Court of Appeal of Florida (“Court”) reversed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of a bank in a foreclosure action because a … Continue reading
March 19, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
February 19, 2013
Eastern District of North Carolina Requires Homeowners to Allege Ability to Fully Tender Outstanding Balance of Loan to State a Claim for Rescission Under TILA, Dismisses All Other Claims
In Ward v. Sec. Atl. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 858 F. Supp. 2d 561 (E.D.N.C. 2012), appeal dismissed (May 30, 2012) the Eastern District of North Carolina granted defendants’ motion to dismiss claims brought against them by borrowers for … Continue reading
February 19, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Utah District Court Holds that Plaintiff’s TILA Claims Are Time-Barred and that MERS Does Not Need to Possess the Note in Order to Appoint a Trustee or Authorize a Trustee to Foreclose
In Rhodes v. Aurora Loan Services, No. 2:10 CV 00230 TC, 2010 WL 3219310 (D. Utah Aug. 13, 2010), the United States District Court of Utah granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims. In October 2006, Plaintiff refinanced the … Continue reading
February 19, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
February 14, 2013
Maine Court Upholds Summary Judgment in Favor of Bank
In JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Harp, 10 A.3d 718 (Me. 2011), the court held that summary judgment in favor of the bank was proper, even though the Bank did not own both the mortgage and note when it filed its … Continue reading
February 14, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
February 13, 2013
Robo-Signing as Abuse of Process?
Apparently not. The Florida Supreme Court issued a narrow ruling in Pino v. Bank of New York that a trial court does not have the authority “to grant relief from a voluntary dismissal where the motion alleges fraud on the … Continue reading
February 13, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments