November 22, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals Holds HSBC Assignment Valid Despite Blank and Undated Allonge
In Buchanan v. HSBC Mortg. Servs., 993 N.E.2d 275, 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 404, 2013 WL 4507932 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), the Indiana Court of Appeals held that HSBC had the right to foreclose on the homeowners’ mortgage, dismissing homeowners’ … Continue reading
November 22, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
November 21, 2013
United States District Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Wrongful Foreclosure, Wrongful Ejectment, and Quiet Title Claims
The court in deciding Billete v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155544, 2013 WL 5840105 (D. Haw. Oct. 30, 2013) dismissed with prejudice the portions of plaintiff’s actions, including: Count I (wrongful foreclosure, wrongful ejectment, and … Continue reading
November 21, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
November 12, 2013
Wrongful Foreclosure Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss
Judge Conti (N.D. Cal.) issued an order granting in part and denying in part a motion to dismiss in Subramani v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al., No. 13-1605 (Oct. 30, 2013). Plaintiff Subramani received a mortgage loan from Defendant … Continue reading
November 12, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Texas Court of Appeals Finds That Plaintiff’s Claim – That the Note and Deed of Trust Became “Split” – Has No Basis in Law
The Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District in deciding Townsend v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 13515, 2013 WL 5874607 (Tex. App. Beaumont Oct. 31, 2013) affirmed the lower court’s decision holding that … Continue reading
November 12, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
October 16, 2013
Glaski Full of It?
I had blogged about Glaski v. Bank of America, No. F064556 (7/31/13, Cal. 5th App. Dist.) soon after it was decided, arguing that it did not bode well for REMICs that did not comply with the rules governing REMICS that … Continue reading
October 16, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
October 15, 2013
Georgia District Court Holds Foreclosure May Be Wrongful Where Security Deed and Note Are “Split”
In Morgan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-3555-AT (N.D.Ga. July 7, 2011), homeowner obtained a residential mortgage loan memorialized by two documents: a promissory note and a security deed. The original grantee of the promissory note was Guaranteed Rate. The original grantee … Continue reading
October 15, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments
October 9, 2013
Enforcing The Mortgage Note
Elizabeth Renuart has posted Uneasy Intersections: The Right to Foreclose and the UCC to SSRN. This is a subject that Brad and I have touched on a bit in the context of the Show Me The Note! defense, but Renuart … Continue reading
October 9, 2013 in Note ownership litigation | Permalink | No Comments