November 14, 2013
Michigan Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s State Law Based Claims of Wrongful Foreclosure
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division after considering the arguments in Ashford v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156159, 2013 WL 5913411 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2013), dismissed the plaintiff’s … Continue reading
November 14, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
November 13, 2013
Massachusetts Land Court Finds Defendant Was Not Entitled to Service Member Relief Act
The Massachusetts Land Court in deciding Suntrust Mortg., Inc. v. Forsberg, 2013 Mass. LCR LEXIS 159 (Mass. Land Ct. 2013) found that defendant (Alfred Forsberg) was not entitled to the protection of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ … Continue reading
November 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Michigan Court Finds Assignment From MERS to Bank of New York Was Valid
The United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division in Maslowski v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156299 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 26, 2013) granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. The crux of plaintiff’s claim … Continue reading
November 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Finds That Wells Fargo Had Standing to File Foreclosure Action
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, in deciding Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Garner, 2013 N.J. Super. LEXIS 2648, 2013 WL 5827033 (App.Div. Oct. 31, 2013) affirmed the lower court’s decision and dismissed motions to vacate the judgment … Continue reading
November 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Nevada District Court Holds that MERS Has Power to Start Foreclosure Action on Behalf of Lender
The federal district court of Nevada in Smith v. Community Lending, 773 F.Supp.2d 941 (D.N.V. 2011), held that MERS properly started a foreclosure action on behalf of the lender, Community Lending, Inc., because it found that MERS acted within the scope of … Continue reading
November 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Kansas Appellate Court Holds that MERS Does Not Have Standing to Initiate Foreclosure Against Homeowners
The Kansas state Court of Appeals in Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Graham, 44 Kan.App.2d 547 (KS Ct. App. 2010) held that MERS did not have standing to start a foreclosure action against two Kansas homeowners because the entity is … Continue reading
November 13, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
November 12, 2013
Wrongful Foreclosure Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss
Judge Conti (N.D. Cal.) issued an order granting in part and denying in part a motion to dismiss in Subramani v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al., No. 13-1605 (Oct. 30, 2013). Plaintiff Subramani received a mortgage loan from Defendant … Continue reading
November 12, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments