January 4, 2013
Exceptions for Mortgagee’s Lack of Standing to Challenge Assignments in Texas
In Kramer v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al., No. A-12-CA-276-SS (W.D. Tex May 15, 2012), the Western District Court in Austin, the home owner sued Fannie Mae, MERS, and Countrywide to quiet title and for a fraudulent foreclosure. Although … Continue reading
January 4, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
Arizona 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Proceeding Finds Lack of Standing with Absence of Mortgage Note
cash loan quick virginia In In re Veal, 450 B.R. 897 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2011) the court held that a party has standing to prosecute a proof of claim involving a negotiable promissory note secured by real property if, under applicable law, … Continue reading
January 4, 2013 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
December 31, 2012
Mortgagee Lacks Standing to Challenge Assignments in Texas
Bridges v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., No. A-12-CA-635-SS (W.D. Tex Sept. 21, 2012), is a recently decided federal district court decision in Texas. The Western District Court in Austin granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s suit. … Continue reading
December 31, 2012 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
December 24, 2012
District Court of Arizona finds homeowners do not have standing to challenge validity of assignments of deed of trust
In Campbell v. California Reconveyance Co., CV-11-00180-PHX-DGC, 2012 WL 5299099 (D. Ariz. Oct. 25, 2012), the court denied plaintiffs/homeowners, David & Marie Campbells’ motion for summary judgment, finding they lacked standing. In July, 2006, plaintiffs received a loan from First … Continue reading
December 24, 2012 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
December 20, 2012
9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Homeowner’s Challenges to Non-judicial Foreclosure in Arizona
In Buchna v. Bank of Am., NA, 478 F. App’x 425 (9th Cir. 2012), the court affirmed the District Court of Arizona’s dismissal of plaintiffs/homeowners Mariusz and Julita Buchna’s action against Bank of America, MERS, and Bank of New York Melon … Continue reading
December 20, 2012 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
December 10, 2012
MERS Must Possess Note or Have Authority to Act on Behalf of Note Holder in Order to Foreclose, According to Massachusetts Supreme Court
In Eaton v Federal National Mortgage Association, 462 Mass. 569 (Mass. 2012), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts addressed “the propriety of a foreclosure by power of sale undertaken by a mortgage holder that did not hold the underlying mortgage … Continue reading
December 10, 2012 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments
December 6, 2012
Nolan Robinson Argues that MERS Should not be Allowed to Initiate Foreclosure Proceedings in Cardozo Law Review
Abstract: Few American homeowners know much about the small, Virginia-based company that has revolutionized the mortgage industry over the past fifteen years. Yet, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) is the named mortgagee on nearly two-thirds of all newly originated … Continue reading
December 6, 2012 in Downstream litigation | Permalink | No Comments