REFinBlog

December 2, 2012

Federal Bankruptcy Court in Idaho Rules that MERS was not a Party in Interest and Lacked Standing to Bring Motion for Stay of Relief

In In re Sheridan, 08-20381-TLM, 2009 WL 631355 (Bankr. D. Idaho Mar. 12, 2009), the Idaho Bankruptcy court held that a party making a motion for stay of relief must be a party in interest. This was defined to mean … Continue reading →

Federal District Court in Idaho Rules for Bank, MERS, et al. in Finding Trustee was Properly Appointed

In Van Kirk v. Bank of America, 1:11-CV-00621-BLW-RE, 2012 WL 4524457 (D. Idaho Oct. 1, 2012), the District Court in Idaho agreed with the magistrate judge that, as a valid beneficiary, MERS properly assigned its interest in the deed of trust to … Continue reading →

Federal District Court in Idaho Rules Bank has Standing in Foreclosure Case

In Purdy v. Bank of America, No. 1:11-CV-00640-EJL-REB (D. Idaho Sept. 26, 2012), in granting Bank of America’s motions to dismiss, the Federal District Court in Idaho agreed with the magistrate judge that the securitization of a note does not … Continue reading →

Federal District Court in Idaho Rules for Bank, MERS, et al., Regarding Quiet Title Dispute

In Gilbert v. Bank of America N.A., No. 1:11-cv-00272-BLW (D. Idaho Sept. 15, 2011), the Idaho District Court granted defendant banks’ motion to dismiss, explaining that the plaintiff homeowner cannot bring a quiet title action without first tendering payment on … Continue reading →

Idaho Supreme Court Rules for Bank, MERS, et al., Regarding Foreclosure Proceedings under Deed of Trust

In Trotter v. Bank of New York Mellon, 152 Idaho 842, 275 P.3d 857 (2012), holding for the defendant bank, the Supreme Court of Idaho held that under the Idaho Deed of Trust Act, the foreclosure process is a non-judicial … Continue reading →

Idaho District Court Rules for Homeowner in Foreclosure Dispute under Deed of Trust

In Ralph v. MetLife, No. CV 2010-0200 (D. Idaho Aug. 10, 2011), in granting partial summary judgment for the plaintiff homeowner, the court found that the defendant bank lacked authority to maintain a non-judicial foreclosure since MERS did not have … Continue reading →

November 29, 2012

New Jersey Bankruptcy Court Finds that “Non-Holder” Cannot Enforce Mortgage Note

In In re Kemp, 440 B.R. 624 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2010) the debtor/plaintiff brought an adversary proceeding to expunge a proof of claim filed on behalf of Bank of New York by loan servicer Countrywide Home Loans. At all relevant times, … Continue reading →