REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

March 26, 2013

Kentucky Attorney General Sues MERS for Recording Fees

By Brad Borden

In Commonwealth of Kentucky v. MERS Holdings, Inc., L3-CI-00060 (Jan. 23, 2013), the Kentucky attorney general filed a lawsuit against MERS seeking recording fees, claiming that it wrongfully held itself out as mortgagee on recorded mortgages, deceptively failed to record … Continue reading

March 13, 2013

MERS-Y! MERS-Y!

By David Reiss

Dustin Zacks has posted Revenge of the Clerks: MERS Confronts County Clerk and Qui Tam Lawsuits, a short article that reviews litigation brought by “county clerks and private qui tam actions assert that MERS has cheated county recorders out of … Continue reading

February 9, 2013

Pennsylvania Court Denies MERS Motion to Dismiss and Rules that a Recorder of Deeds May Bring a Quiet Title Action to Compel MERS to Record Mortgage Assignments

By Abigail Pugliese

In Montgomery County, Pennsylvania v. MERSCORP, INC., No. 11 CV 6968, 2012 WL 5199361 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2012), the court denied MERS’s motion to dismiss because 21 Pa. Stat. 351 requires recordation of all conveyances and because the “Legislature … Continue reading

February 8, 2013

Arkansas District Court Dismisses Recording Fee Case

By Gloria Liu

In Brown v. Mers, No. 11-cv-06070 (W.D. Ark., 2012), the Arkansas District Judge dismissed a recording-fee lawsuit filed against MERS and held that state laws do not require mortgage assignments to be recorded. The case had transformed into a class … Continue reading

January 23, 2013

Court Dismissed Claim of Violation of the Nevada False Claims Act

By Karl Dowden

In State of Nevada, ex rel. Barrett Bates, et al. v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., et al., No. 11-16310 (9th Cir. 2012) (unpublished),  the Court of Appeals for the federal court of Nevada affirmed the lower court’s decision to … Continue reading

January 16, 2013

Class Action Recording Fee Suit in Missouri Dismissed

By Karl Dowden

Jackson County, Missouri v. MERSCorp, Inc., et al., No. 12-0665-CV-W-ODS (W.D. Mo. Jan. 14, 2013) is a suit by Jackson County to recover lost recording fees resulting from the use of MERS. This suit is a class action law suit … Continue reading

November 20, 2012

Federal District Court in Texas Rules That Third-Party Lacks Standing in Recording-Fee Case

By Karl Dowden

It appears that although courts may be receptive to claims about lost recording fees because of MERS, they won’t hear cases brought by third parties (at least, not in federal court). The citizens of a Texas county brought the claim … Continue reading