March 8, 2016
Tuesday’s Regulatory & Legislative Roundup
- The ACTION Campaign submitted a letter to Congress requesting it expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit.
- Senators Patrick Leahy and Chris Coons, and Representative Marcia Fudge released Dear Colleague letters in support of robust funding for the HOME Investment Partnerships program.
- The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HUD and several other agencies announced targeted program support for State Medicaid-Housing Agency Partnerships.
March 8, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
Monday’s Adjudication Roundup
- The New York Court of Appeals reinstated suit against Donald Trump for defrauding customers of Trump University finding that the state did not take too long to bring suit.
- The Battery Park City Authority pled to the Second Circuit to not revive claims against licensed asbestos handlers responsible for cleanup work near Ground Zero, arguing that the claims are time barred.
- New York federal judge did not dismiss class action brought by a Belgian investment fund against Bank of New York Mellon for failing as trustee in $1.2 billion in residential mortgage-backed securities.
March 7, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
March 4, 2016
Why Doctors Buy Bigger Homes Than Lawyers
Realtor.com quoted me in Why Doctors Buy Bigger Homes Than Lawyers (and What It Means to You). It reads, in part,
Take that, Alan Dershowitz: Although both doctors and lawyers can typically afford better-than-decent-sized homes, a new working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that in states with a certain legal provision, physicians’ houses are bigger. Often much bigger.
So what’s the deal? It seems to come down to two factors: First, the skyrocketing costs of financially devastating medical malpractice suits; second, a once-obscure provision called “homestead exception” which can protect the assets of doctors in some states from being wiped out by those suits when they invest their cash in their homes.
“We have been interested in understanding how does that pervasive aspect of a physician’s career influence the decisions they make … whether it means they invest more in houses to protect themselves against liability,” Anupam Jena, an associate professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School and a co-author of the paper, tells the Washington Post.
Here’s how homestead exception works: If creditors are hounding you for unsecured debts—as opposed to secure ones, like your mortgage—they can’t take your home as collateral, as long as you declare bankruptcy. In fact, they can’t even place a lien on the property to collect when you sell. These exemptions vary by state: Some, such as New Jersey, have no such safeguard; in California, individuals’ homes are protected up to $75,000 (which generally won’t get you past the front porch).
Yet a handful of states—Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, as well as the District of Columbia—have unlimited homestead exemption. Doctors in those states bought homes that were 13% more expensive than the homes of doctors elsewhere. The homes of medical doctors (and dentists, who are essentially in the same medical malpractice boat) were markedly more expensive than the homes of professionals making similar salaries—even lawyers, who know a thing or two about malpractice suits. The authors drew from U.S. Census Bureau data on 3 million households about profession, household income, and home value.
So why should you care? Because homestead exemptions apply to you, too—even if the closest you come to the medical profession is annual checkups and late night reruns of “ER.”
* * *
But don’t get the wrong idea: The homestead exemption isn’t a bulletproof way to ward off foreclosure. Remember, it applies only to unsecured debt such as credit cards—not secured debt like your mortgage.
“If you borrow money for a home, the homestead exemption typically does not apply,” says David Reiss, research director at the Center for Urban Business Entrepreneurship at Brooklyn Law School. In other words, if you don’t pay your mortgage and default on your loan, your lender can foreclose and seize your home.
And we’re not saying you should run from your creditors, because eventually they’ll catch up to you. But if you are in financial straits and scared sick of losing your house, check your local homestead exemption laws first—you might be safer than you think.
March 4, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
Friday’s Government Reports Roundup
- The S. Department of Commerce found that in January 2016, the sale of single-family homes decreased by 9.2 percent from a 10-month high. However, most believe that the housing market remains stable.
March 4, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
March 3, 2016
The State of Moderate-Income Housing
The Center for Housing Policy’s most recent issue of Housing Landscape gives its 2016 Annual Look at The Housing Affordability Challenges of America’s Working Households (my discussion of the Center’s 2015 report is here). it opens,
Millions of working households face big challenges in finding affordable housing, particularly in areas with strong economic growth. In 2014, more than 9.6 million low- and moderate-income working households were severely housing cost burdened. Severely cost burdened households are those that spend more than half of their income on housing costs. Overall, 15 percent of all U.S. households (17.6 million households) had a severe housing cost burden in 2014, with renters facing the biggest affordability challenges. In 2014, 24.2 percent of all renter households were severely burdened compared to 9.7 percent of all owner households. These percentages were even higher for working households, of whom 25.1 percent of renters and 16.2 percent of owners had a severe housing cost burden.
Housing costs continue to rise, particularly for working renters, who saw their median housing costs grow by more than six percent from 2011 to 2014. And for the first time since 2011, housing costs increased for working owner households as well, marking the end of a three-year downward trajectory. Additionally, more working households were renting their homes as opposed to buying—52.6 percent of working households were renters in 2014, up nearly two percentage points from 2011, when the share was 50.8 percent.
With more working households renting their homes, demand for rental housing continues to grow, pushing rents even higher in already high-cost rental markets. And although incomes are growing for many working households, this growth is not always sufficient to offset rising rents, meaning that working renter households are increasingly having to spend a higher proportion of their incomes on housing costs each month. (1)
The report outlines a series of good policy proposals (many of which are politically unfeasible in the current environment) to address this situation. But my main takeaway is that the wages of working-class households “are not sufficient for meeting the cost of adequate housing.” (5) Their housing problem is an income problem.
March 3, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
Thursday’s Advocacy & Think Tank Roundup
- The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies released 2016 Update on Homeownership Wealth Trajectories through the Housing Boom and Bust, which it had originally released in 2013. “It examines the goals of homeownership and lessons from the housing crisis.”
- The Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development released “Who is Lending and Who is Getting Loans?” report, finding that lending data does not match NY’s demographic data. For example, 22 percent of New Yorkers are black and 29 percent are Hispanic, but 8.7 and 8.4 percent of mortgages went to those groups in 2014, respectively.
- Enterprise Community Partners and the Center for Outcomes Research and Education released “Health in Housing: Exploring the Intersection Between Housing and Health Care”, which shows that having affordable housing paired with health care services reduces emergency room visits, lowers Medicaid costs and increases access to primary care.
March 3, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments


