February 24, 2016
Wednesday’s Academic Roundup
- The Dynamics of Subprime Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Default: A Structural Estimation, Hanming Fang, You Jin Kim & Wenli Li, FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 16-2.
- The Federal Home Loan Bank System and U.S. Housing Finance, W. Scott Frame, FRB Atlanta Working Paper No. 2016-2.
- Examination of Potential Misrepresentation in CMBS, Ruoyu Shao.
- Does Zoning Help or Hinder Transit-Oriented (Re)Development?, Jenny Schuetz, G. Giuliano & Eun Jin Shin.
- A Simple Model of Subprime Borrowers and Credit Growth, Alejandro Justiniano, Giorgio E. Primiceri & Andrea Tambalotti, CEPR Discussion Paper No. CP11083 (Paid Access).
- Enhancing the Urban Environment Through Green Infrastructure, John R. Nolon, Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2016.
- Spillover Effects of Continuous Forbearance Mortgages, Kadiri Karamon, Douglas A. McManus & Elias Yannopoulos.
- Hobby Lobby as a Land Use Case: Charting For-Profit RLUIPA Claims, Ross Campbell, NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2016, Forthcoming.
- A Forced Labor Theory of Property and Taxation, Theodore P. Seto, The Philosophy of Tax Law (Oxford University Press 2016), Forthcoming; Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016-04.
February 24, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
Tuesday’s Regulatory & Legislative Roundup
- Governor Cuomo announced a new program to investigate discrimination in housing rentals and sales, which uses undercover trained testers to act as potential home purchasers and renters.
February 23, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
Monday’s Adjudication Roundup
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. settles for $27.5 million in an investor class action over toxic collateralized debt obligations. A New York federal judge has preliminarily approved the settlement.
- In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, the plans must prioritize condominium liens, which the district court determined addresses not only payment, but also security, “and therefore doesn’t elevate the collateral of the lien.”
- NY Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, states that Morgan Stanley will pay $3.2 billion to settle claims of misleading investors about the quality of the mortgage-backed securities it packaged prior to the financial crisis.
- Borrowers have filed suit against Bank of America NA for intentionally and systematically failing to release mortgage liens on their property when they repaid everything, creating affected property titles.
February 22, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
February 19, 2016
Borrowing Constraints and The Homeownership Rate
Arthur Acolin, Jess Bricker, Paul Calem and Susan Wachter have posted a short paper on Borrowing Constraints and Homeownership to SSRN. The abstract reads,
This paper identifies the impact of borrowing constraints on home ownership in the U.S. in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. The existence of credit rationing in the U.S. mortgage market means that some households for whom it would be optimal to choose to be homeowners may not be able to do so. Borrowers with certain wealth, income and credit characteristics are unable to obtain a loan even if they are willing to pay a higher cost of credit (Linneman and Wachter 1989). The Stiglitz and Weiss (1981) canonical model sets up the rationale for this credit rationing. Using data from the 2001, 2004-2007 and 2010-2013 Surveys of Consumer Finance (SCF), this paper measures the impact of changes in the income, wealth and credit constraints on the probability of home ownership. Credit supply eased and then became considerably more restricted in the wake of the Great Recession. The loosening of borrowing constraints was accompanied by an increase in home ownership from the late 1990s until the start of the housing crisis. In this paper we estimate the role the tightening of credit has had on the probability of individual households to become homeowners and the decline in the aggregate home ownership rate following the crisis. The home ownership rate in 2010-2013 is predicted to be 5.2 percentage points lower than it would be if the constraints were at the 2004-2007 level and 2.3 percentage points lower than if the constraints were set at the 2001 level.
This paper builds on some of the other work of the authors (see here for instance) on the homeownership rate. The paper makes a valuable contribution by estimating the impact of credit rationing on the homeownership rate. To the extent we can identify an optimal amount of credit supply, it should help us to determine a target homeownership rate to guide policymakers.
February 19, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments
Friday’s Government Reports Roundup
- Last week, President Obama released the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Budget to Congress and HUD released its FY17 Budget Fact Sheet for its proposed budget prioritizing ending family homelessness and increasing opportunity.
- The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released a paper on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for unemployed childless adults.
- The US Department of Housing and Urban Development released a report on its federal Choice Neighborhoods Initiative through which it aims to strengthen low-income neighborhoods. It has awarded 56 planning grants and 13 implementation grants for $500,000 and $30.5 million, respectively.
February 19, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments


February 22, 2016
Consumer-Friendly Financial Innovation
By David Reiss
Under the Policy, Bureau staff would, in its discretion, issue no-action letters (NALs) to specific applicants in instances involving innovative financial products or services that promise substantial consumer benefit where there is substantial uncertainty whether or how specific provisions of statutes implemented or regulations issued by the Bureau would be applied (for example if, because of intervening technological developments, the application of statutes and regulations to a new product is novel and complicated). The Policy is also designed to enhance compliance with applicable federal consumer financial laws. A NAL would advise the recipient that, subject to its stated limitations, the staff has no present intention to recommend initiation of an enforcement or supervisory action against the requester with respect to a specified matter. NALs would be subject to modification or revocation at any time at the discretion of the staff, and may be conditioned on particular undertakings by the applicant with respect to product or service usage and data-sharing with the Bureau. Issued NALs generally would be publicly disclosed. NALs would be nonbinding on the Bureau, and would not bind courts or other actors who might challenge a NAL recipient’s product or service, such as other regulators or parties in litigation. The Bureau believes that there may be significant opportunities to facilitate innovation and access, and otherwise substantially enhance consumer benefits, through the Policy. (1-2)
Colleagues and I had commented on this policy when it was first proposed, arguing that it should incorporate metrics to ensure that it is achieving its stated goals. It does not seem that the CFPB agreed with our comments. So, while I think the final policy is a step in the right direction, I am not sure if we can really measure how good of a step it is.
Share this:
Like this:
February 22, 2016 | Permalink | No Comments