January 23, 2017
Mortgage Moves in 2017
MortgageLoan.com quoted me in Three Mortgage Moves o Consider in 2017. It opens,
How much do you think about your mortgage? Probably not much at all.
But financial professionals say that homeowners can save money, lower the amount of interest they pay each year and maybe free up some extra cash, all by tweaking their mortgages, whether they are paying off a conventional loan, FHA mortgage or VA loan.
If you’ve gotten into the habit of ignoring your mortgage, it’s time to take a look at what is probably your biggest financial obligation. Here are three suggestions from mortgage lenders and financial pros to use your mortgage to better your finances in 2017.
Going Short-Term
Are you paying off a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage? It might be time to refinance that loan, not for the benefit of lower interest rates but to turn your mortgage into one with a shorter term.
Turning your loan from a 30-year version to a 15-year one will result in a higher monthly mortgage payment. But you’ll also dramatically reduce the amount of interest you’ll have to pay over the life of your loan. Mortgage rates with 15-year, fixed-rate loans are lower than the ones attached to longer-term loans, too.
“Going shorter term is a big financial benefit,” said Jason Zimmer, president of Lockport, Illinois-based Parlay Mortgage. “The 15-year loan is where you want to go. You can save so much money.”
Look at the financial difference: Say you are paying off a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage of $250,000 at an interest rate of 4.09 percent. Your monthly payment, not including property taxes or insurance, will be about $1,200. But you’ll pay a total of $184,000 in interest if you take the entire 30 years to pay off your loan.
But say you now owe $225,000 on that same loan. If you refinance that amount to a 15-year, fixed-rate mortgage with an interest rate of 3.33 percent, your monthly payment, not including taxes and insurance, will jump to just under $1,600. But if you take the full 15 years to pay off this loan, you’ll only pay about $61,000 in interest, a huge savings from that 30-year loan.
“Lots of people don’t consider a 15-year, fixed-rate mortgage for a refinance because they knew they could not afford one when they bought their house in the first place,” said David Reiss, professor of law at Brooklyn Law School in New York City. “But if you have had your house for more than a couple of years, and your income has increased in the interim, refinancing into a 15-year, fixed-rate mortgage can be a great way to get a lower interest rate and pay a lot less interest in the long run.”
January 23, 2017 | Permalink | No Comments
Monday’s Adjudication Roundup
- J.P. Morgan Chase settled a case against them for allegedly charging African Americans and Hispanics higher mortgage rates. This 53 million dollar settlement comes from the company’s practices just three years after the U.S. housing market crash.
- A Texas developer is suing the city of Dallas; however, a Texas justice refused to hear the case. Local developers claim the city built a library on the land in violation of the deed.
- Pennsylvania state senators recently became involved in a lawsuit between a landowner and Delaware River Basin Commission’s for the commission’s fracking venture. The senators allege that the state did not give the commission the proper authority.
January 23, 2017 | Permalink | No Comments
Friday’s Government Reports Roundup
- A paper, titled How Low Can House Prices Go? Estimating a Lower Bound, discusses how in risk management, the credit risk and required capital associated with mortgage assets is often estimated through stress testing where the house price path is an important determinant of the severity of the stress test.
- HUD published an implementation notice for several of the provisions of the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA), which passed Congress and was signed into law by President Obama in July 2016. The provisions specifically impact the Housing Choice Voucher and Project-Based Voucher programs. HUD’s notice seeks additional public input on the proposed implementation requirements and future changes to these programs. Comments are due March 20, 2017.
- During his nomination hearing to become HUD Secretary, Dr. Ben Carson said that he would not seek to eliminate rental assistance; however, the future of public housing remains uncertain. The incoming administration will inherit a public housing system with a shortfall of $25.6 billion for much-needed repairs, as well as waiting lists of hundreds of thousands of individuals hoping to find an affordable home. Some housing advocates have concerns regarding the possibility of instituting work requirements and time limits for public housing residents, which would disproportionately burden elderly and disabled public housing residents.
January 20, 2017 | Permalink | No Comments
January 19, 2017
New Protections for Homeowners
Consumers Digest quoted me in Protections Coming for Homeowners. It opens,
New rules that cover mortgage servicing aren’t dramatic, but they should help certain consumers, experts say. In August 2016, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finalized rules that focus on foreclosure protections and delinquencies.
“These changes are more at the margins,” says David Reiss, who is a law professor at Brooklyn Law School. “It’s looking at normal situations that occur and adding protections for consumers.”
The new rules, which are expected to take effect by 2018, would prevent dual tracking. Dual tracking is when foreclosure proceedings start while a homeowner who is current on his/her mortgage awaits a decision about a request to work with the loan servicer to avoid foreclosure. (This request is known as loss mitigation.)
In addition, borrowers who are current on their mortgage since a prior loss-mitigation application can avoid foreclosure by having their application reviewed again if they have unexpected financial difficulties. Loan servicers also have to notify borrowers when a loss-mitigation application is complete. Finally, if a borrower is in foreclosure and his/her loan is transferred to another servicer, he/she won’t have to restart the loss-mitigation application process with the new servicer.
January 19, 2017 | Permalink | No Comments
Thursday’s Advocacy & Think Tank Roundup
- Although federal guidelines allow foreclosed homes to be sold with occupants, in a recently published article in Housing Policy Debate, the author reports that the guidelines are largely irrelevant in practice. In fact, data obtained from HUD through a Freedom of Information Act request shows that in Fiscal Years 2010-2014, there were a total of 23,746 requests for FHA-insured foreclosed properties to be conveyed while occupied. However, only 87 of those requests—much less than one percent—were approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Federal Housing Administration (FHA),
- In a blog post by Enterprise, the author addresses the nomination of Dr. Ben Carson as the lead of HUD and his rhetoric regarding his vision of the agency.
- In an op-ed, Matt Hoffman, vice president at Enterprise Community Partners, examines several ways in which cities can become more equitable, vibrant and affordable. According to Hoffman, cities should consider: cracking down on the housing black market, empowering tenants, using municipal property for housing, putting good schools in neighborhoods that need them the most, thinking and acting inter-jurisdictionally and making all data public.
January 19, 2017 | Permalink | No Comments
January 18, 2017
Hidden Mortgage Fees
TheStreet.com quoted me in Hidden Fees Cost Consumers Billions: Which Ones Are the Worst? It opens,
Consumers are notoriously combative over high product and sales fees, and who can blame them?
Fees for common items like mortgages, credit cards, bank accounts and online deliverables, among many others, can really add up, and do hit consumers hard in the pocketbook.
That goes double for so-called “hidden fees” – shadowy charges on goods and services that buyers usually don’t know about.
A new study by the Washington, D.C.-based National Economic Council shows that Americans lose “billions of dollars” from such hidden fees. Another study of communications firms like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast by the Consumer Federation of America pegs hidden fee costs at $60 billion annually.
Few hidden fees are favored by consumer advocates, but some are worse than others.
“My household bills look very much like those of a typical consumer – two cell phones, cable, broadband and landline telephone,” says Dr. Mark Cooper, the CFA’s Director of Research and author of the communications industry report. “Hidden fees – excluding the price of the service, taxes, and governmental fees – added about 25% to my total bill.”
Here’s a quick list:
* * *
Mortgage fees – Outside of the cable/telecom arena, the mortgage sector may well boast the most hidden fees. “When applying for a mortgage, a borrower can be hit with all kinds of obscure fees like processing fees, notary fees, courier fees, even fees for sending emails,” says David Reiss, a professor of law at Brooklyn Law School. ” Before paying the mortgage application fee, the borrower should ask whether any of the fees are waivable. If they are charged by the lender, as opposed to a third party like a government agency, they may very well be waivable.”
Consumers should be on the lookout for hidden fees, across the board. Some solid due diligence can keep a few more bucks in your pocket and strike a blow against companies with fee programs that operate in the shadows, time and time again.
But as of right now, those hidden fees are paying off for companies, and at U.S. consumers’ expense.
January 18, 2017 | Permalink | No Comments



