REFinBlog

September 3, 2013

Arizona Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Show-Me-The-Note Claim in Its Entirety

The Arizona Court that decided AOM Group LLC et al v. Mortgage IT, Inc. et al., No. CV 09-2639-PHX-SRB (D.Ariz.)(2010) held that the plaintiff’s ‘show me the note’ argument was lacking in merit. The plaintiff brought an action that challenged … Continue reading →

The United States District Court for the District of Arizona Reasons That the Plaintiff Agreed to Empower MERS to Foreclose

The United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Silvas v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al., cv00265 (AZ Dist., 2009), reaffirmed MERS’ standing as the beneficiary of a deed of trust. In the present case, the plaintiff brought … Continue reading →

The United States District Court for the District of Arizona Finds That the Borrower Gave MERS the Ability to Take Any Action, Which the Lender Would be Able to Take

The United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Blau v. America’s Servicing Company, et al, No. CV-08-773 (D. Ariz., 2009), acknowledged that MERS, acting as a beneficiary, was the proper party to execute an assignment of the … Continue reading →

U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona Found the Mere Use of MERS Nid Not Constitute Common Law Fraud

The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, in Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., No. 09-cv-00517 (D.Ariz. 2009), dismissed all state and federal claims brought by all three of the borrowers. The borrowers filed a complaint against … Continue reading →

August 20, 2013

Arizona Court Holds That MERS is the Beneficiary With the Authority to Foreclose

The court in Ciardi v. The Lending Company, Inc. et al., 2010 WL 2079735 (D. Ariz. 2010) held that that MERS is the beneficiary with the authority to foreclose. In doing so the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss … Continue reading →

August 19, 2013

NJF and UCC and Contract Law, Oh My!

Parsing how a court should approach a particular deed of trust foreclosure case can put you to sleep faster than crossing the poppy fields next to the yellow brick road.  Does the Non-Judicial Foreclosure (NJF) statute govern? Does the state’s … Continue reading →

March 26, 2013

US District Court for Arizona Rejects Split-Note Theory Claim Made in Multi-District Litigation

In In Re MERS Litigation, 09-2119-JAT (D. Ariz. 2011), the case was a multi-district litigation concerning claims related to the formation and operation of MERS, Inc. and MERSCORP, Inc. The plaintiffs alleged violations of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 33-420; the … Continue reading →