REFinBlog

Editor: David Reiss
Brooklyn Law School

July 17, 2013

What Was S&P Puffing?

By David Reiss

I have been closely following DoJ’s suit against S&P since the complaint was filed in February (and see here, here and here).  DoJ alleges that S&P “issued or confirmed ratings that did not accurately reflect true credit risks” and seeks … Continue reading

March 11, 2013

Reiss on Booming Structured Finance Litigation

By David Reiss

Law360 interviewed me about the boom in structured finance litigation arising from the Financial Crisis (here, behind a paywall): banks will not be able to let their guard down anytime soon, thanks to the U.S. Department of Justice’s rediscovery of … Continue reading

March 4, 2013

Second Circuit Finds Plausible Claims of Widespread Misconduct in RMBS Offering

By David Reiss

The Second Circuit ruled in New Jersey Carpenters Fund v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group et al. on a number of issues, but of interest to me are the sections dealing with allegations of misrepresentations. The Court writes that … Continue reading

February 15, 2013

California’s S&P Suit

By David Reiss

The California complaint follow on the heels of the DoJ complaint but it hangs its hat on an aggressive theory — that S&P’s ratings violate California’s False Claims Act.  While I do not yet have an opinion about whether that … Continue reading

February 8, 2013

More on DoJ’s S&P Complaint

By David Reiss

I highlighted some of the juicy bits of the complaint a few days ago.  There has been a lot of discussion of the suit and related issues.  Here is my two cents’ worth. FIRREA, an untested enforcement statute, has gone … Continue reading

January 16, 2013

Rating Agency Liability The Wide World Over

By David Reiss

Haar has posted a draft of Civil Liability of Credit Rating Agencies – Regulatory All-or-Nothing Approaches between Immunity and Over-Deterrence. This paper helps to fill in a gap in the literature about potential liability of rating agencies across the globe.  … Continue reading

November 16, 2012

Federal Court of Australia Holds Standard & Poor’s Liable for Misrepresentaions in Ratings of CDOs

By Brad Borden

In a treatise-length opinion, the Federal Court of Australia held that Standard & Poor’s is liable for damages that investors incurred as a result of purchasing CDOs that Standard & Poor’s had rated AAA. See Bathurst Regional Council v Local … Continue reading