Tag Archives: capital stack

Condo Project Borrows From Its Future Residents

Posted on by
Reply

By AramilFeraxa – Own work, CC BY 4.0

The Wall Street Journal quoted me in The Luxury Beverly Hills Condo Project Borrowing Money From Its Future Residents (behind a paywall). It opens,

The developer behind one of the country’s most expensive real-estate projects has an unusual request for its condo buyers: Lend us money.

Purchasers of the site’s roughly 150 condo units are also providing debt to help Cain, an investment firm based in London, fund its $10 billion project, known as One Beverly Hills.

The 17.5-acre site, set to be completed in 2029, will include high-end retail such as Dolce & Gabbana, upscale dining, 78 new hotel suites and acres of botanical gardens. The ultraluxury condos will be operated by Aman, one of the world’s leading high-end hotel operators.

The condo owners’ debt takes the form of a bond—the developers call them Founder Bonds—and buyers will receive a return of 5%, according to a person familiar with the matter.

No condo buyers are forced to participate in the bond program. Founder Bonds offer a financial return and the opportunity to assist in the construction of their future home, Cain has told condo buyers.

When the Founder Bond program was launched early last year, 10-year Treasury debt offered less than 5% returns. In recent weeks, however, the 10-year yield has exceeded that level, rising above 5.3% at one point this month. That means Founder Bond holders are now earning less than the yield on Treasurys, which are commonly considered the “risk-free” rate.

But some say this rarely seen financing tool sticks condo buyers with a risk.

The bonds are junior to other debt on the project, which includes a $2.8 billion senior loan led by J.P. Morgan and a $1.5 billion mezzanine loan from VICI Properties. Parts of both loans are conditional on Cain hitting certain sales milestones.

That means that if the condo towers were to fall short of completion—in a city where most luxury buyers are focused on single-family homes and estates—bondholders could be left not only without the penthouse they were expecting, but also without the extra money lent to the developers.

“Even though these are luxury buyers, I would guess they’re going to face more exposure if the project goes bust than they may realize,” said David Reiss, a professor at Cornell Law School, who researches real-estate finance. “They’re getting paid a small amount to take a large amount of risk…but because they’re luxury, they may be able to tolerate the risk better.”

Foreign Funding for Real Estate Projects

Posted on by

Jeanne Calderon and Gary Friedland have posted A Roadmap to the Use of EB-5 Capital: An Alternative Financing Tool for Commercial Real Estate Projects. The paper provides a great overview of a relatively new source of funding for real estate deals. The introduction opens,

From an immigrant’s perspective, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program (“EB-5” or the “Program”) represents merely one of several paths to obtain a visa.  The EB-5 visa is based on the immigrant’s investment of capital in a business that creates new jobs. However, from a real estate developer’s perspective, the immigrant’s investment to qualify for the visa creates an alternative capital source for the developer’s project (“EB-5 capital” or “EB-5 financing”).

Despite the Program’s enactment by Congress in 1990, for many years EB-5 was not a common path followed by immigrants to seek a visa. However, when the traditional capital markets evaporated during the Great Recession, developers’ demand for alternate capital sources rejuvenated the Program. Since 2008, the number of EB-5 visas sought, and hence the use of EB-5 capital, has skyrocketed. EB-5 capital has become a capital source providing extraordinary flexibility and attractive terms, especially to finance commercial real estate projects. Consequently, many developers routinely consider EB-5 capital as a potential source to fill a major space in the capital stack. As the financing tool becomes more widely known and understood, this source of capital should become even more popular.

The EB-5 investor’s motivation for making the investment accounts for the relative flexibility and favorable terms afforded by EB-5 capital compared to conventional capital sources. Unlike that of the conventional capital providers (such as banks, private equity funds, REITs, life insurance companies and pension funds), the EB-5 investor’s reason for making the investment is to secure a visa. Thus, his primary objective at the time of making the investment is to satisfy the EB-5 visa requirements. Consequently, so long as the investor believes that the investment will qualify for the visa and result in the safe return of his capital, he is willing to accept a below market, if not minimal, return on the investment. Furthermore, the investor might not require some of the other protections that more sophisticated, conventional real estate investors typically seek.

*     *     *

Simply stated, the Program requires that the immigrant make a capital investment of $500,000 or $1,000,000 (depending on whether the project is located in a “Targeted Employment Area”) in a business located within the United States. The business must directly create 10 new, full-time jobs per investor. Thus, the number of jobs that a project will create is a key determinant of the amount of the potential EB-5 capital raise. (3-4)

This once exotic funding technique is now becoming quite mainstream. Of interest to some readers of this blog, the paper describes at various points how EB-5 funds have been used in residential projects. The paper is a useful introduction for those who want to know more about this program.